Who is this for at an enterprise?
The finding stays with its proof so the team that owns the surface can see the impact, and the next pass can show whether it is still there.
FOR ENTERPRISES
One workspace across every surface
Appsec, source, cloud, and workspace teams investigate in the same place. When a route, a commit, an account, or a tenant setting changes, the loop runs again and the finding keeps its evidence.
Find vulnerabilities. Prove their impact.
Continuous across the estate
The same loop, on each surface you connect
WEB
Applications and APIs
Continuous DAST on the live estate. Hypotheses and compared responses stay on the finding.
SOURCE
Repositories
Local code, GitHub, and GitLab. A commit is the reason for the next pass through the code.
CLOUD
AWS, Google Cloud, Azure
Connected accounts stay under assessment. Drift comes back with the resource as evidence.
WORKSPACE
Microsoft 365 and Google
Tenant and organization settings stay in the research loop when they change.
01
Connect the surfaces that exist
Start with the applications, repositories, cloud accounts, and workspace tenants already in scope. Add a surface when that estate joins the research.
02
Keep the evidence with the team that owns it
A finding carries the reproduction steps and the proof of impact. The next pass shows whether that impact is still there.
Evidence
What we can prove for an enterprise
Cloud control counts are a published catalog. They are not a consolidation or breach study.
- 790+
- Published cloud controls
- AWS · GCP · Azure
- Cloud package
01Cloud assessment depth is a published control catalog.
ResultCloud posture publishes 790+ controls: AWS 340, Google Cloud 212, Azure 245 API-auditable. Collectors emit PASS, FAIL, NOT_APPLICABLE, or UNKNOWN. Incomplete API responses are not marked Pass.
MethodCount of CIS-mapped cloud controls as published on Trusteed cloud pages as of the date below.
Scope · September 2026Connected AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure accounts. Not a Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace control-count claim.
02These pages do not publish a named customer study, a certificate timeline, or a ticket-volume SLA.
ResultWe do not publish named before-and-after studies for startups, enterprises, or MSSPs. −71% is Trusteed’s IP-intel funnel (Sept 2026), not the outcome of a Web, Source, Cloud, or Workspace investigation.
MethodFirst-party IP enrichment funnel published on Trusteed IP pages.
Scope · September 2026Do not copy −71% into a business case. Do not cite an unattributed buyer-percentage as a Trusteed study.
Buying questions
Is the workspace right for an enterprise?
Several teams share one research workspace. Each package is a surface that stays on a continuous pass.
02How do the four packages split the estate?
Connect the surfaces that are in scope. Add another when that estate joins the research. Pricing follows the surfaces.
| Package | What stays continuous |
|---|---|
| Web | Live applications and APIs |
| Source | Repositories as commits land |
| Cloud | AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure accounts |
| Workspace | Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace settings |
03When is this the wrong buy?
Keep the detection console and the auditor. Use the workspace for the investigation and the evidence.
Not a fitWrong buy for a program that only wants a policy library or a one-week consultant map.
Find vulnerabilities. Prove their impact.
Web, Source, Cloud, and Workspace stay in one continuous research workspace.