Form a hypothesis on the live application or in the source, run the test, and keep the result on the finding. A new route or commit starts that pass again.
Find vulnerabilities. Prove their impact.
Test the running target. Compare what two accounts receive. Attach both responses to the finding. The next deploy is the next pass.
Web package →Read the path in the repository and keep the hypothesis next to the file. A new commit is the reason to look again, then confirm impact on the live app when it is in scope.
“This endpoint might skip an authorization check.” Request it as the owner and as a second account. If the bodies match, that comparison is the evidence on the finding.
Evidence
A finding on this page is evidence of impact, not a customer conversion study.
ResultWe do not publish named before-and-after studies for investigations. −71% is Trusteed’s IP-intel funnel (Sept 2026), not the result of a Web or Source pass.
MethodFirst-party IP enrichment funnel published on Trusteed IP pages.
Scope · September 2026Do not copy −71% into an investigation business case.
Buying questions
The workspace tests a hypothesis on the live application or in the source, then keeps the proof on the finding. The pass runs again when that surface changes.
You stay in the loop. The AI proposes the next check and you see what came back. A list of issues without proof of impact is not the finding.
ExampleAn orders endpoint is requested as the owner and as a second account. Matching bodies are attached to the finding.
Use the repository to name the path. Use the live application to show what that path does.
| Package | Continuous pass |
|---|---|
| Web | Live apps and APIs |
| Source | Local code, GitHub, GitLab |
The investigation stays open because the application and the repository keep changing.
Not a fitWrong buy for a team that will not connect an application or a repository.
A list of issues is not the outcome. The finding has to show what happened.
