FOR MSSPs

The same research loop, for every client

Give each client a workspace. Connect their web apps, source, cloud accounts, and workspace suite. When those change, the investigation runs again and the finding you show them carries the evidence.

Find vulnerabilities. Prove their impact.

Per client

Connect the surfaces that client actually has

WEB

Their apps and APIs

Continuous DAST on that client’s live applications. Findings stay in their workspace.

SOURCE

Their repositories

Local code, GitHub, or GitLab for the client who gives you the repo. A commit starts the next pass.

CLOUD

Their cloud accounts

AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure, assessed continuously, with the resource on the finding.

WORKSPACE

Their suite

Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace for that tenant. Configuration changes stay in the loop.

What you hand the client

A finding with reproduction steps and proof of impact, from the surface you connected. Start with one client and one surface. Add the others when that estate is in scope.

Evidence

What we can prove for an MSSP

Start with one client. These pages do not publish a multi-tenant SLA or a noise-reduction percentage for your queue.

1 client
The first pass worth dating
4
Surfaces you can connect per client
  1. A buyer can see an external web surface without an agent or inbound ports.

    ResultThe public Attack Surface Scan maps subdomains, IPs, open ports, and visible products from outside in about two minutes. Trusteed reports 41k+ domains mapped on that scanner. The scan sends no packets into the target’s internal network.

    MethodPassive and unauthenticated external reconnaissance from Trusteed’s scanners. Timing is wall-clock from submit to first report. Domain count is the cumulative first-party total on the free tool as of the date below.

    Scope · September 2026Internet-facing hostnames. This is an outside view of the Web surface. It is not authenticated API testing, source review, cloud inventory, or workspace configuration.

  2. These pages do not publish a named customer study, a certificate timeline, or a ticket-volume SLA.

    ResultWe do not publish named before-and-after studies for startups, enterprises, or MSSPs. −71% is Trusteed’s IP-intel funnel (Sept 2026), not the outcome of a Web, Source, Cloud, or Workspace investigation.

    MethodFirst-party IP enrichment funnel published on Trusteed IP pages.

    Scope · September 2026Do not copy −71% into a business case. Do not cite an unattributed buyer-percentage as a Trusteed study.

Buying questions

Is the workspace right for an MSSP?

Each client gets the same research loop. You connect the surfaces that client has, and you show findings that carry their evidence.

  1. 01Who is this for at an MSSP?
  2. 02What do you hand the client?
  3. 03When is this the wrong buy?

Who is this for at an MSSP?

The workspace is per client. Web, Source, Cloud, and Workspace are the packages you connect for that client, not a single asset-count tier.

What do you hand the client?

Partner delivery terms are a conversation. This page does not publish a white-label SLA or a noise-reduction percentage for your queue.

ExampleWeek one: one client, their API, two accounts, matching responses attached to the finding. That packet is what you reuse.

When is this the wrong buy?

Those retainers stay with the provider. This workspace is the investigation and the evidence you show the client.

Not a fitWrong buy for a client with no application, repository, cloud account, or workspace to connect.

Partner with us

One client. Then the next.

Run the AI Pentesting & Security Research Workspace per client. Show the finding with its evidence.